The article discusses the dominance of renewables, specifically large-scale solar and big batteries, in the Australian power generation sector. Despite the push to end the nuclear ban in the country, experts argue that nuclear energy is not economically feasible for Australia, with costs being significantly higher compared to renewables. The draft GenCost 2024-25 Report highlights the consistent low costs of renewables over the years, with the capital costs of solar farms decreasing while battery costs have seen a notable 20% reduction. Furthermore, the update includes a premium for hydrogen readiness in new gas turbine projects, reflecting a growing trend towards cleaner energy sources. The article emphasizes the need for consultation and deep pockets for nuclear energy development in Australia, projecting a lead time of at least 15 years. Opposition Leader Peter Dutton's nuclear policy costings are awaited, while advocates stress the long operating life benefits of nuclear compared to renewables, a claim refuted by the CSIRO. The article concludes with key cost updates for various energy technologies and the open feedback period for the draft report until February 11.